Scaling, Expanding and Iterating Innovations (SEI) Proposals

To support those interested in applying for an SEI grant, STELAR is planning webinars and workshops to answer questions and provide feedback for grant developers. 

Prepare to Scale, Expand, and Iterate your STEM and ICT Learning Innovations

Body

The NSF Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) is interested in supporting research and development projects to expand upon work with proven success. This year, the program seeks to fund 3 to 5 awards for Scaling, Expanding, and Iterating Innovations (SEI) with durations up to five years and budgets up to $3,500,000. The due date for the proposal is August 11, 2023. Read the solicitation here

When planning to scale your work, consider that SEI projects: 

  1. Broaden the implementation and research of an innovation at a significant scale of five to ten times greater than the original implementation. 
  2. Extend an innovation to different student populations, regions of the country, grade levels or ages of students with varying skills, and educators' capacities in PreK-12 formal and informal settings. 
  3. Examine issues of transferability and generalizability and the factors that support or inhibit scaling. 
  4. Assess cognitive and social-emotional student outcomes and measure student STEM knowledge and whether students continue to pursue further STEM and ICT education or careers. 

 

Resources

NSF Webinar: Guidance for ITEST SEI Proposals on Scaling Prior Research

Body

On Thursday, April 27, STELAR hosted NSF Program Officers Arlene de Strulle and Stephanie Teasley for a presentation on the essential components of successful Scaling, Expanding, and Iterating Innovations (SEI) ITEST proposals. Below are the slides from this webinar.

ITEST SEI Concept Worksheet

Body

In advance of the 2023 ITEST solicitation deadline, NSF Program Officers received concept worksheets from STEM and ICT learning projects that are preparing to scale their work. The POs provided feedback on the relevancy of the research questions prospective projects aim to investigate in their scale-ups. Click on the link below to read the concept worksheet questions.

Recent Video

Body

Videos

Body

Scale-up Experiences, Successes, & Challenges

Below you will find a series of videos from the 2022 ITEST PI Meeting featuring several ITEST Principal Investigators sharing their SEI work at different stages.

Click the fullscreen icon in the video for better viewing Expand

Body

Conceptualizing a Scale-up Proposal | ITEST PI Meeting 2022

NSF Program Office Arlene de Strulle poses questions to guide researchers' proposal conceptualization for an ITEST Scaling, Expanding, and Iterating Innovations (SEI) award.

Body

Defining Scaling for your Project| ITEST PI Meeting 2022

As the resource center for the NSF ITEST Program, STELAR would like to highlight additional tools, resources, and information that are freely available to assist proposal writers.

Body

Collecting Sufficient Data for a Scale Up Award | ITEST PI Meeting 2022

The Drone Research Opportunities for Native Elementary Students (DRONES) project is preparing for a potential scale up by expanding their research practices and understanding how they can scale their work.

Body

Adapting Curriculum and PD to Scale in New Regions | ITEST PI Meeting 2022

With demonstrated growth in student STEM content knowledge, teacher STEM awareness, and teacher self-efficacy teaching integrated STEM, the Teachers and Researchers Advancing Integrated Lessons in STEM (TRAILS) project received an award to scale up their work to reach 10,000 students. In this clip, the presenters relate how they located partners in rural populations, and their approach adapting their curriculum and PD using place-based knowledge.

Body

Determining Sufficient Evidence to Scale| ITEST PI Meeting 2022

The Youth Astronomy Network (YouthAstroNet) project shares how they knew they had sufficient evidence to apply for a Scaling, Expanding, and Iterating Innovations (SEI) award. They identified 34 different instructional experiences the students might have had ran a regression model and factor analysis to better understand which of these interventions mattered for learning, interest, and identity gains.